ecoww

*ecoww.com Ecology World Wide*
*Factual information and solutions*
Home Tax Gas prices Power prices NetZero Scientific Method Inquire Nuclear News Contact
We provide backup for our conclusions. You can check the arithmetic yourself
*Example of 'global warming' waste is Australia's new $2.4 billion tax*			*Governments may have good intentions but make bad decisions not based on reality*
Their proposed subsidy on home batteries will cost every household $A245 from every pocket. The arithmetic is simple, $2,400,000,000 divided by 9,800,000 occupied homes, each household will have to pay $245 on their power bill or tax. Anyone taking the subsidy will loose more money because of the huge cost of renewables and batteries. Again simple arithmetic. A typical battery, Tesla 13.5 kW, costs $15500. Current interest rate 6.2%. Warranted for 37.8 MWh and 70% @ 10 yrs, thus 15500x0.7x1.34 / (37800x0.85)= 45 cents/kWh. Plus the cost for solar cells etc. Some batteries cost up to 81 cents for every kWh provided. It's much cheaper to get power from the grid at 24.8 (Vic) to 34.2 (NSW) cents/kWh. It gets worse, if they don't use all the power themselves, then there's only the 8 to 11 cents feed-in hand out, giving a loss of 35 cents on every kWh.			The government reports DO NOT say how energy plans effect power bills. Considering the millions spent on reports, and 100's of millions spent on "research", it is amazing that they do not say how the policies will increase power bills. We provide accurate advice on how bills will GROW and GROW with expensive renewables expansion. We can provide accurate factual reports on the real cost of the different sources of energy. The prices quoted in most reports are simply not correct, and more importantly do not use the Scientific Method to justify their opinions. We can provide comprehensive and fully justified reports on each energy source:- - solar - wind - gas - coal - nuclear Our Scientific report on one of these can be provided for $25,000, click to discuss the extent and details.
			Our reports can include, but are not limited to:- Practicality of energy sources Cost analysis of energy sources Future planning for energy sources Comparison of costs for different energy sources
*Climate change and "Net Zero" planning reports*
Governments claim to be moving towards "net zero" . However the reports provided are in all cases NOT based on the Scientific Method, and worse still are reliant on non-existing technology. Examples are Australia's and UK's policies assuming and depending on "Gas with Carbon Capture Storage". There are no examples of anywhere in the world where gas power has the CO2 output captured. If possible at huge cost, only a portion of the gas can be collected, the remainder released to pollute the world. Also, in real situations there is nowhere to store the gas collected. So despite claims, "net zero" cannot be reached under current "renewable" scenarios. The only energy source for low energy grid electricity is nuclear. The departments producing these nonsense reports have budgets of $billions. We can produce a workable and fully practical route to a low carbon future, fully costing ALL available options. The cost of such investigation with a real, viable pathway forward is in the order of $250,000, a fraction of what is currently being spent on policy reports that assume fantasy "new technology" that will never exist.			*We apply the Scientific Method to our work.*
			This involves:- - Collection of raw data - Generating a hypothetical explanation for the data - Checking and calculating using the hypothesis and data - Providing the hypothetical solution results - Publishing the raw data, results and calculations, and the solution. - It is important that the raw data is within the publication. - Nowadays the raw data required by the Scientific Method can be easily published on the internet. - Provision should be available with the publication for people to make comments on the hypothesis and/or calculations. At ecoww.com we strictly follow the Scientific Method. All the other reports and publicity on climate change we have examined do not comply with the Scientific Method, they are mostly comments and personal opinions, or do not provide full details required to justify their opinions. Note the so called "peer review" has nothing to do with the Scientific Method.

To make enquires click here.			To make enquires click here
We provide accurate costs for nuclear and renewable backup, we use other costs from government reports unchecked. We are in the process of checking all costs.