ecoww

	*ecoww.com Ecology World Wide*
	*Factual information and solutions*
	Home Gas prices Power prices NetZero Scientific Method Inquire Nuclear Contact
	To provide consistancy all $ prices provided on the site are in USA dollars unless specified otherwise.
	*Our mission*	*Governments may have good intentions but make bad decisions not based on reality*
	Most reports on CO2 pollution are paid for and reflect the opinions and predudice of the organisation paying for them. This Web Site contains unbiased scientific facts, we do this in our own time unfunded. We can provide reports specifically for your organisation. We can also provide critiques on other published news in your field. Our reports, unlike other consultants, are based on the Scientific Method and verifiable facts. Our main focus is producing reports that have a verifiable basis and can stand robust scrutiny.
		The government reports DO NOT tell us how their energy plans effect your power bills. Considering the millions spent on these reports, and the 100's of millions spent on "research", it is amazing that they do not tell you the effect their policies will have on your power bills. We believe that the impact on your bill is hidden because they know it will increase enormously. We can provide accurate advice on how your bill will GROW and GROW with the expansion of expensive renewables. We can provide accurate factual reports on the real cost of the different sources of energy. The prices quoted in most reports are simply not correct, and more importantly do not use the Scientific Method to justify their opinions. We can provide comprehensive and fully justified reports on each energy source:- - solar - wind - gas - coal - nuclear Our Scientific report on one of these can be provided for $25,000, click to discuss the extent and details.

	Our reports can include, but are not limited to:- Practicality of energy sources Cost analysis of energy sources Future planning for energy sources Comparison of costs for different energy sources

	*Climate change and "Net Zero" planning reports*
Governments in the west claim to be moving towards "net zero" . However the reports provided are in all cases NOT based on the Scientific Method, and worse still are reliant on non-existing technology. Examples are Australia's and UK's policies assuming and depending on "Gas with Carbon Capture Storage". There are no examples of anywhere in the world where gas powered energy has the CO2 output captured. If it was possible it will be at huge cost, and only a portion of the gas can be collected, the remainder is released to pollute the world. As well as that, in real situations there is nowhere to store the gas collected. So despite claims by governments', "net zero" cannot be reached under current "renewable" energy scenarios. The only energy source for low energy grid electicity is nuclear. The departments producing these nonsense reports have budgets of $billions. We can produce a workable and fully practical route to a low carbon future, fully costing ALL available options. The cost of such investigation with a real, viable pathway forward would be in the order of $250,000, a fraction of what is currently being spent on policy reports that assume fantasy "new technology" that will never exist.

		*We apply the Scientific Method to our work.*
		This involves:- - Collection of raw data - Generating a hypothetical explanation for the data - Checking and calculating using the hypothesis and data - Providing the hypothetical solution results - Publishing the raw data, results and calculations, and the solution. - It is important that the raw data is within the publication. - Nowadays the raw data required by the Scientific Method can be easily published on the internet. - Provision should be available with the publication for people to make comments on the hypothesis and/or calculations. At ecoww.com we strictly follow the Scientific Method. All the other reports and publicity on climate change we have examined do not comply with the Scientific Method, they are mostly comments and personal opinions, or do not provide full details required to justify their opinions. Note the so called "peer review" has nothing to do with the Scientific Method.
	To make enquires click here.	To make enquires click here
	To make enquires click here.
We provide accurate costs for nuclear and renewable backup, we use other costs from government reports unchecked. We are in the process of checking all costs.